Reliability of the Non-contact TONO-i Tonometer Compared with the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
نویسندگان
چکیده
Purpose: The accuracy and agreement of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using a noncontact self-measuring tonometer, TONO-i, compared with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT).Methods: A total 35 healthy participants 42 primary open angle or normal tension glaucoma patients were enrolled in this study. TONO-i GAT obtained mean difference IOPs was analyzed paired <i>t</i>-test. IOP calculated two-way random effects model. Bland-Altman analysis simple linear regression used to estimate disagreement between measurements.Results: measured 15.9 ± 3.3 mmHg 16.4 5.1 mmHg, respectively. In patients, values (16.7 4.1 mmHg) lower than those (17.9 6.1 mmHg; <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, there no significant among (<i>p</i> = 0.273). intraclass coefficients (95% confidence interval) for all participants, 0.847 (0.702-0.920), 0.882 (0.804-0.941), 0.828 (0.742-0.887), respectively, indicating good measurements. limits not statistically significant. As increased, absolute also increased.Conclusions: novel may be reliably self-measurement detecting elevations. caution must exercised because possibility underestimating high IOPs.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL
OBJECTIVE WE AIMED TO COMPARE INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE (IOP) MEASUREMENTS VIA THREE DIFFERENT TONOMETERS: the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen(®) XL (TPXL), and a non-contact airpuff tonometer (NCT). METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of 200 eyes from 200 patients. Right eyes of all patients were included in this study. IOP was measured via GAT, NCT, and TPXL by three phys...
متن کاملComparison of the CT80 Non-Contact Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
Aim of Study: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the computerized tonometer 80 non-contact tonometer (CT80 NCT) and those with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in patients with normal and high IOP. Patients and Methods: This observational clinical study comprised 187 eyes of 105 patients (54 men and 51 women), who had their IOP readings measured with bo...
متن کاملIntraocular pressure measurement: Goldmann Applanation Tonometer vs non contact airpuff tonometer.
BACKGROUND An accurate assessment of Intraocular pressure (IOP) is vital in establishing diagnosis of Glaucoma and decision making regarding various treatment modalities available. The purpose of this study is to compare Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) with Air puff tonometer. METHODS Cross-sectional comparative study conducted. 73 eyes from 73 patients were included in this study and in...
متن کاملClinical comparison of the ProTon and Tono-Pen tonometers with the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
A clinical evaluation of a new electron ProTon tonometer was performed comparing the values of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured using this instrument with those determined by a similar instrument, Tono-Pen XL, and by Goldmann applanation tonometry. The mean IOP measured in 106 eyes with the ProTon tonometer was not significantly different from that determined with Goldmann applanation, while...
متن کاملClinical comparison of Pulsair non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in Indian population.
INTRODUCTION Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) is the gold standard for Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement but has disadvantage of being contact device and problems with portability. The aim of the study was to compare the Keeler's Pulsair noncontact tonometer (NCT) with GAT in Indian Population. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-one subjects were screened from a Glaucoma clinic of a tertia...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['0378-6471', '2092-9374']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2023.64.5.416